Understand many members
either are not sure how the maintenance charges in JVR have its present genesis
of the calculation / breakup or think it’s been all cooked up to benefit one
section. This thought process has germinated specially in a particular class
who have either have a suspecting mind or suffer with inferiority complex. Let’s
dissect the whole issue.
It is crystal clear that
most services except a part of the House Keeping (Car Parking Area cleaning
being only extra area) are common services and consumed equally irrespective of
the size of DUs / Flats.
Sure we have Maintenance
Charges in many Civil and some Fauji Societies charged purely on Sq Feet basis,
but we must then also understand their intrinsic logic and their nature of
common type of construction. If we can have a better system where the more
micro level calculations are available, which allows us to have more precise
and a reasonable calculation, then why not use the same.
Our 02 types of the Flats
in JVR are a) A-Type 1275 and b) B-Type-817 which leads to
817/1275 = 0.64 or in simple for 1 : 0.64 ratio
of sft. Applying same ratio for sharing of HK expenses as obtained from the
year 01 Apr 16 to 31 Mar 17 JVR Behala actual expenses below :-
So can we now by above
logic increase Rs 167/- for B-Type Flats and simultaneously decreasing Rs 62/-
for A-Type.
Please note amounts
received from Additional Parking , Storage in Basement Area and in various
rooms in A-Blocks go towards contributing in common fund benefiting B-Type too,
where the CAPEX / AFNHB cost has been shared by A-Types only.
Can we have some better
calculations , logic and fundamental of break ups ? Else this cobweb from some
disgruntled minds should be removed once for all.
